Together we can stop the coup and save democracy!

House Republicans introduced a budget resolution on February 12, 2025 that calls for major tax cuts for wealthy individuals and corporations.

Full bill text can be found here:
Establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2025 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2026 through 2034.

We ran the bill through ChatGPT for a summary and interpretation.

Jump to Prompts:

  1. Please summarize this budget resolution.
  2. You are an economics expert and won the Nobel Prize in economics. You are also a legal scholar. Please review this budget resolution. Give an analysis and opinion. Who will this impact positively and who will this impact negatively.
  3. You are also a public policy and international relations expert. Where would this budget resolution place us with respect to other countries in the world.
  4. If this budget resolution passes, what are the specific negative impacts that you foresee happening in the next 3-6-12 months. What are the specific positive impacts that you foresee.
  5. Please do the same positive/negative, but at the 5 year mark. Then compare to where the US is now and assess whether the US is better or worse off, using whatever metric(s) you prefer.

Prompt 1

Please summarize this budget resolution.

ChatGPT said:

The House Budget Committee has recently advanced a budget resolution for fiscal year 2025, aiming to implement President Trump’s policy agenda. This resolution outlines significant tax cuts, spending adjustments, and allocations for defense and border security. Below is a summary of its key components:

Key Components of the FY 2025 Budget Resolution:

  1. Tax Cuts and Revenue Adjustments:
    • $4.5 Trillion in Tax Cuts: The resolution permits up to $4.5 trillion in tax reductions over the next decade, focusing on extending previous tax reforms and introducing new cuts.
      nypost.com
  2. Spending Adjustments:
    • $2 Trillion in Spending Cuts: To offset the proposed tax cuts, the resolution mandates $2 trillion in spending reductions over ten years, targeting programs such as Medicaid and food assistance.
      wsj.com
    • $300 Billion for Defense and Border Security: An additional allocation is designated for enhancing national defense and securing the U.S. border.
      nypost.com
  3. Debt Ceiling Increase:
    • $4 Trillion Increase: The resolution proposes raising the debt limit by $4 trillion to accommodate the tax cuts and additional spending.
      apnews.com
  4. Reconciliation Process:
    • Facilitating Legislative Passage: The resolution includes instructions for the reconciliation process, allowing certain budget-related bills to pass with a simple majority in the Senate, thereby bypassing potential filibusters.
      politico.com

Political Context and Next Steps:

The advancement of this budget resolution reflects internal negotiations within the Republican Party, balancing the priorities of fiscal conservatives and the broader legislative agenda. While the House aims to pass the resolution promptly, the Senate is considering an alternative approach, focusing initially on defense and border security, with tax and spending issues addressed subsequently.

nypost.com

This resolution serves as a framework for enacting President Trump’s domestic policies, with detailed legislation to follow. The reconciliation instructions are pivotal for enabling the passage of these policies in the Senate without requiring a supermajority.

Prompt 2

You are an economics expert and won the Nobel Prize in economics. You are also a legal scholar. Please review this budget resolution. Give an analysis and opinion. Who will this impact positively and who will this impact negatively.

ChatGPT Said:

The budget resolution for fiscal year 2025 through 2034 proposes a framework that aims to reduce deficits, modify spending across various categories, and implement policies intended to stimulate economic growth through deregulation, tax reduction, and spending cuts. Below is my analysis and opinion on its potential impact.

Key Observations

  1. Deficit Reduction and Spending Changes
    • The resolution instructs multiple committees to propose legislation that will collectively reduce the deficit by trillions of dollars. The largest reductions are expected from:
      • The Energy and Commerce Committee ($880 billion)
      • The Education and Workforce Committee ($330 billion)
      • The Agriculture Committee ($230 billion)
    • Conversely, some areas, such as Homeland Security ($90 billion increase) and Armed Services ($100 billion increase), will see budget increases.
  2. Debt Ceiling Increase
    • The resolution calls for a $4 trillion increase in the statutory debt limit, acknowledging the need for borrowing even while attempting to cut deficits.
  3. Policy Focus on Market Deregulation
    • The document promotes a free-market approach, arguing that federal intervention should be minimized and regulations that “pick winners and losers” should be reduced.
    • It suggests that government intervention in markets can hinder growth and proposes lowering taxes, reducing bureaucratic regulations, and expanding energy production.
  4. Cuts to Mandatory Spending
    • The resolution emphasizes reducing mandatory spending, which currently makes up over 70% of the federal budget.
    • It identifies the rapid growth of mandatory programs as a major fiscal challenge and suggests that reducing these expenses is necessary for long-term sustainability.

Who Will Benefit?

✅ Corporations and Investors

  • Lower taxes on capital gains, businesses, and deregulation will likely increase corporate profits.
  • The energy sector, in particular, may benefit from expanded production and relaxed regulatory measures.

✅ Wealthier Households

  • If tax cuts are included, high-income earners will likely see lower tax burdens.
  • Deregulation of financial services may create more investment opportunities.

✅ Defense and Homeland Security Contractors

  • Increased spending in these areas means greater funding for military contracts, cybersecurity, and border security initiatives.

✅ Small Business Owners

  • Fewer regulations and lower tax burdens could stimulate small business growth and hiring.

Who Will Be Negatively Affected?

❌ Low-Income Individuals and Families

  • The proposed cuts to education, social services, and healthcare spending suggest reductions in programs that benefit low-income populations.
  • Reductions in agriculture spending may affect food assistance programs (e.g., SNAP).

❌ Public Sector Employees and Programs

  • Government agencies facing budget reductions may experience job losses or reduced services.
  • Programs tied to public infrastructure, transportation, and environmental protection may see cutbacks.

❌ Seniors and People Dependent on Social Programs

  • Cuts to mandatory spending suggest potential reductions in Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security growth.
  • With 70% of the budget allocated to these programs, any significant deficit reduction will likely affect these entitlements.

❌ Students and Educators

  • The $330 billion cut in Education and Workforce funding may reduce financial aid, funding for public schools, and workforce training programs.
  • If Pell Grants and student loan relief programs are cut, higher education access may decline.

❌ Environmental and Climate Policy Advocates

  • The emphasis on expanding energy production suggests a move toward fossil fuels, potentially undermining climate initiatives.
  • Deregulation in energy could weaken environmental protections.

Overall Opinion and Considerations

This budget resolution reflects a conservative fiscal approach that prioritizes debt reduction, deregulation, and lower taxes while reducing public spending on key social services. While it may stimulate short-term economic growth, it risks increasing income inequality and could place a greater burden on vulnerable populations.

  • If economic growth occurs as projected, the private sector may absorb some displaced workers and services.
  • However, if economic conditions worsen, cuts to social programs could exacerbate hardships for those dependent on public assistance.
  • The emphasis on deregulation could benefit economic efficiency, but may come at the cost of environmental protections and labor standards.

Prompt 3

You are also a public policy and international relations expert. Where would this budget resolution place us with respect to other countries in the world.

ChatGPT said:

International Perspective on the U.S. Budget Resolution: Comparative Analysis

This budget resolution, with its emphasis on deficit reduction, deregulation, tax cuts, and increased defense spending, positions the United States uniquely compared to other advanced economies. Below is an analysis of how these policies align or diverge from global economic, social, and strategic trends.

1. Global Fiscal Policy Comparison

📉 Austerity vs. Expansionary Policies

  • The U.S. is shifting toward fiscal conservatism by focusing on deficit reduction and spending cuts in social programs.
  • In contrast, European nations (e.g., Germany, France, and Scandinavian countries) continue to invest heavily in social welfare, healthcare, and education, seeing these as long-term economic stabilizers.
  • The U.S. approach aligns more with the UK’s recent austerity policies, which have been controversial due to their impact on public services.

🏛 Spending on Social Programs

  • The U.S. already spends less on social welfare as a percentage of GDP than many European countries.
    • U.S. social spending (~19% of GDP) vs. OECD average (~25% of GDP).
  • Cutting mandatory spending (Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, SNAP, and education funding) further widens the gap between the U.S. and other developed nations that prioritize social safety nets.
  • Nations like Canada and Australia maintain balanced budgets without severe reductions in social services, instead relying on progressive taxation and wealth redistribution—something absent from this budget resolution.

2. Defense and Security

💰 Military Spending: Maintaining U.S. Dominance

  • The resolution increases defense spending while cutting domestic programs. This solidifies the U.S. as the world’s largest military spender.
  • In 2023, the U.S. defense budget ($850B) exceeded the combined total of the next 10 countries (China, Russia, India, Saudi Arabia, etc.).
  • This budget ensures U.S. military dominance but risks increased geopolitical tensions (e.g., arms races, Chinese and Russian military expansion).

🌍 Alliances & Global Commitments

  • The increase in defense spending aligns with NATO and Indo-Pacific strategic goals, signaling continued commitment to countering China and Russia.
  • However, proposed cuts to international affairs spending could weaken U.S. diplomatic engagement, soft power, and foreign aid programs—giving China an advantage in economic diplomacy (e.g., Belt and Road Initiative).

3. Economic Positioning in the Global Market

🏭 Competitiveness and Tax Policy

  • By reducing regulations and lowering taxes, the U.S. moves closer to a low-tax, free-market economy model seen in Singapore, Hong Kong, and post-Brexit UK.
  • However, lack of investment in education and infrastructure risks reducing long-term competitiveness compared to innovation-driven economies like Germany, South Korea, and China.

🔋 Energy Production vs. Climate Goals

  • The resolution’s focus on expanding energy production suggests a prioritization of fossil fuels over green energy.
  • This puts the U.S. at odds with the EU, Canada, and Japan, which have committed to aggressive carbon reduction policies.
  • The U.S. could fall behind in the global clean energy race, where China is already leading in renewable technology exports.
  • The $4T increase in the debt ceiling is necessary to prevent default but keeps the U.S. on a high-debt trajectory.
  • Japan and the EU have pursued similar policies but have higher tax rates to offset debt, unlike the U.S., which prioritizes tax cuts over debt stabilization.
  • If the U.S. reduces government spending while maintaining high debt, credit rating agencies may raise concerns, affecting global investor confidence.

4. Geopolitical Implications: Soft Power vs. Hard Power

🤝 Foreign Aid & Global Influence

  • Cuts to international affairs spending may weaken U.S. leadership in global development and humanitarian efforts.
  • Meanwhile, China continues expanding foreign investments and trade agreements, potentially increasing its influence in Africa, Latin America, and Southeast Asia.
  • EU nations and Japan maintain strong foreign aid programs that enhance their soft power, while the U.S. risks a reduced diplomatic footprint.

🌏 Economic Alliances and Trade

  • The focus on domestic deregulation and tax cuts does not emphasize trade competitiveness.
  • Other countries are forming new trade blocs (e.g., RCEP, CPTPP) that exclude the U.S. and favor China’s economic leadership.
  • If U.S. infrastructure and education funding fall behind, long-term economic growth and innovation leadership could shift to Asia and Europe.

Final Assessment: Where Does This Budget Place the U.S. Globally?

✅ Strengths of This Budget:

  • Maintains military dominance, reinforcing hard power globally.
  • Appeals to free-market investors, potentially attracting corporate investment.
  • Reduces regulatory burdens, increasing short-term economic efficiency.

❌ Weaknesses and Risks:

  • Increases wealth inequality, moving the U.S. away from the European-style social model.
  • Weakened diplomacy & foreign aid may reduce U.S. global influence relative to China.
  • Long-term competitiveness in technology and green energy may decline as the U.S. underfunds education and R\&D.

🚦 Final Verdict:

  • This budget moves the U.S. toward a military-dominant, free-market model, closer to a Singapore/Hong Kong-style economic policy.
  • However, lack of investment in social programs, education, and diplomacy may reduce U.S. soft power and long-term economic growth.
  • The biggest international risks come from falling behind in innovation, global influence, and trade competitiveness while prioritizing domestic deregulation.
Prompt 4

If this budget resolution passes, what are the specific negative impacts that you foresee happening in the next 3-6-12 months. What are the specific positive impacts that you foresee.

ChatGPT said:

If this budget resolution passes, its effects will unfold in different stages, impacting the economy, government services, and geopolitical positioning. Below is a timeline-based analysis of the likely negative and positive impacts at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after passage.

Short-Term Impacts (First 3 Months)

⏳ Timeframe: April – June 2025

  • The budget implementation process begins, with immediate market reactions and preliminary spending adjustments.

🔴 Negative Impacts

  1. Stock Market Volatility
    • Uncertainty around spending cuts and tax policy changes could cause turbulence in financial markets.
    • Defense and energy stocks may surge, while healthcare, education, and infrastructure sectors could see declines.
  2. Federal Agency Disruptions
    • Government departments facing budget cuts (e.g., Education, Agriculture, Social Services) will begin laying off workers or freezing hiring.
    • Agencies such as HUD (affordable housing), USDA (food assistance), and Department of Education (grants & loans) may start preparing for reduced funding.
  3. Economic Uncertainty & Consumer Caution
    • Cuts to social programs and anticipated layoffs in public sectors may create consumer anxiety, reducing discretionary spending.
    • Lower-income households will tighten budgets in anticipation of possible SNAP (food stamps) and Medicaid reductions.
  4. International Allies Raise Concerns
    • Cuts to foreign aid and diplomatic budgets may cause allies to question U.S. global commitments.
    • Nations reliant on U.S. support (e.g., Ukraine, Taiwan, developing nations) could seek alternative partners (China, EU).

🟢 Positive Impacts

  1. Stock Market Confidence in Business & Energy
    • Lower corporate taxes and reduced regulations will likely boost investor confidence in energy, defense, and finance sectors.
    • Big businesses may ramp up hiring and expansion plans.
  2. Strengthened U.S. Dollar
    • With the debt ceiling increase secured, the risk of a government shutdown is averted, stabilizing the dollar and avoiding a credit rating downgrade.
  3. Defense & Security Growth
    • Increased defense spending will benefit military contractors, leading to new defense projects and hiring.

Mid-Term Impacts (First 6 Months)

⏳ Timeframe: July – December 2025

  • The impact of budget cuts and new economic policies becomes more tangible.

🔴 Negative Impacts

  1. Higher Unemployment in Public & Nonprofit Sectors
    • Agencies implementing budget reductions will have to lay off employees.
    • Social workers, public educators, and low-level government employees may lose jobs.
    • Nonprofit organizations relying on federal grants (healthcare, education, poverty relief) will cut services or close down.
  2. Healthcare Disruptions
    • Medicaid and Medicare budget adjustments could lead to higher costs for patients and delays in services.
    • Potential hospital funding reductions may cause staff shortages in low-income and rural areas.
  3. Student Loan and Education Program Cuts
    • Students relying on Pell Grants, subsidized loans, or public education funding could see higher tuition costs or limited access to financial aid.
    • Schools with federal funding may cut programs.
  4. Housing Crisis Worsens
    • Reductions in HUD funding could lead to less rental assistance and fewer affordable housing projects.
    • Rent prices may increase, disproportionately affecting low-income families.
  5. Labor Protests and Political Tensions
    • Public sector job losses may trigger teacher strikes, protests by social workers, and union pushback.
    • Political polarization intensifies as different groups push for budget amendments.

🟢 Positive Impacts

  1. Business Growth & Job Creation in Private Sector
    • Companies in energy, defense, finance, and tech will increase hiring and investments.
    • Less corporate taxation encourages business expansion.
  2. Debt Stabilization & Lower Inflation
    • Deficit reductions could lower inflationary pressures, helping interest rates stabilize.
    • Lower federal borrowing needs may prevent further spikes in national debt interest costs.
  3. Geopolitical Military Strength
    • With higher military spending, the Pentagon can increase deployments, military aid, and tech investments, strengthening U.S. global military influence.

Long-Term Impacts (First 12 Months)

⏳ Timeframe: January – June 2026

  • The broader economic and social consequences fully materialize.

🔴 Negative Impacts

  1. Widening Income Inequality
    • High-income earners and corporations benefit from tax cuts and deregulation.
    • Low- and middle-income families experience wage stagnation, job insecurity, and reduced government support.
  2. Rise in Poverty & Food Insecurity
    • Cuts to SNAP, welfare, and unemployment programs may lead to increased homelessness and food insecurity.
    • Charities and local governments struggle to cover gaps in public assistance.
  3. Healthcare & Life Expectancy Decline
    • More uninsured individuals as Medicaid expansions slow and affordable healthcare options shrink.
    • Longer wait times in hospitals and reduced rural healthcare services.
    • U.S. health outcomes diverge further from peer nations (EU, Canada, Japan).
  4. Higher Crime Rates & Social Instability
    • Rising poverty and unemployment may correlate with higher crime and unrest.
    • Local governments will struggle to fund law enforcement, community programs, and rehabilitation services.
  5. International Influence Declines
    • Reduced foreign aid and diplomatic engagement allows China, Russia, and the EU to fill power vacuums in Africa, Latin America, and Asia.
    • Allies question U.S. reliability, potentially seeking alternative economic and military agreements.

🟢 Positive Impacts

  1. Long-Term Deficit Reduction Could Strengthen U.S. Credit
    • If spending cuts effectively lower deficits, the U.S. could maintain high credit ratings, reducing borrowing costs.
  2. Private Sector Innovation & Economic Growth
    • Deregulation in tech, energy, and finance may spur innovation, leading to job growth in high-income sectors.
    • AI, biotech, and energy industries could expand due to less government oversight.
  3. Stock Market Boom for High-Income Investors
    • Corporate profits and stock buybacks continue driving stock market growth.
    • Investors benefit from tax cuts and pro-business policies.

Final Assessment: Balancing Risks & Gains

🔴 Risks of This Budget

  • Social instability increases, with more inequality, unemployment, and poverty.
  • Healthcare and education access declines.
  • U.S. soft power weakens internationally due to reduced foreign aid.

🟢 Benefits of This Budget

  • Short-term economic growth through deregulation.
  • Stock market gains, benefiting corporations and wealthy investors.
  • Lower government borrowing costs, which may stabilize inflation.

Biggest Uncertainty: Will Growth Offset Social Costs?

  • If business expansion compensates for job losses, the economy may recover in the long run.
  • If social cuts lead to instability, the U.S. risks a recession, increased crime, and lower life expectancy.
Prompt 5

Please do the same positive/negative, but at the 5 year mark. Then compare to where the US is now and assess whether the US is better or worse off, using whatever metric(s) you prefer.

ChatGPT said:

Projected Impacts at the 5-Year Mark (2030)

⏳ Timeframe: 2025-2030
By 2030, the effects of this budget resolution will be fully realized. The U.S. will either see a stronger economy with controlled deficits and business-led growth or deepened inequality, a weakened middle class, and reduced global influence. Here’s how things may look after five years:

🔴 Negative Impacts (Worst-Case Scenario by 2030)

1. U.S. Social Fabric Weakens Due to Inequality

  • The wealth gap expands further as tax cuts and deregulation benefit the wealthy, while spending cuts harm lower-income groups.
  • Poverty rates rise due to cuts in Medicaid, SNAP, and housing assistance, with homelessness increasing in major cities.
  • Life expectancy declines due to reduced healthcare access, especially in rural and low-income areas.

2. Workforce and Education System Decline

  • Cuts to education and job training cause a drop in workforce productivity.
  • The U.S. falls behind in STEM education, worsening talent shortages in high-tech industries.
  • College tuition rises further due to cuts in Pell Grants and federal aid, leading to higher student debt burdens.

3. Healthcare Crisis Deepens

  • Medicaid enrollment drops, leaving millions uninsured.
  • The rise in medical costs and hospital closures in low-income areas increase preventable deaths.
  • Drug prices rise, with weaker government regulation allowing more monopolistic practices.

4. U.S. Falls Behind in Global Competitiveness

  • While China and the EU continue investing in AI, renewables, and high-tech industries, the U.S. lags due to underfunded research.
  • Green energy industry suffers, with fossil fuel expansion prioritized over climate-friendly initiatives.
  • Deregulation and tax cuts may cause economic booms, but weaken the U.S.’s ability to lead on innovation and sustainability.

5. Political and Social Instability Rises

  • Weakened public services lead to higher crime rates, with local governments struggling to fund police, mental health programs, and public safety initiatives.
  • Political polarization intensifies, with continued battles over tax policy, debt limits, and public spending.
  • Strikes, protests, and worker activism increase as workers push back against stagnant wages and loss of benefits.

🟢 Positive Impacts (Best-Case Scenario by 2030)

1. Stronger GDP Growth & Market Confidence

  • If tax cuts and deregulation spur private sector expansion, GDP grows steadily at 3-4% annually.
  • Stock markets thrive, with corporations reinvesting in automation, energy, and defense.

2. Lower Inflation & Controlled Debt

  • Deficit reduction efforts lower long-term borrowing costs.
  • If the private sector grows fast enough to compensate for social spending cuts, government debt stabilizes under 100% of GDP.

3. Stronger Military & Defense Sector

  • Higher military spending strengthens U.S. presence in global security.
  • Investment in cybersecurity and space defense makes the U.S. technologically dominant in warfare.

4. Deregulation Spurs Innovation in Select Industries

  • Fewer government restrictions allow faster R\&D breakthroughs in sectors like biotech, AI, and fintech.
  • Private companies step into spaces traditionally controlled by the government, such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure.

5. Energy Boom & Manufacturing Growth

  • Expansion of domestic energy production (oil, gas, renewables) may make the U.S. energy-independent.
  • Deregulation boosts U.S. exports, improving trade balance.

Comparing the U.S. in 2025 vs. 2030: Are We Better or Worse Off?

To assess whether the U.S. is better or worse off in 2030, let’s compare where it stands now (2025) vs. projected outcomes in 2030 across key economic and social metrics.

Metric 2025 (Current Status) 2030 (After Budget Plan) – Best Case 2030 (After Budget Plan) – Worst Case
GDP Growth ~2% annual growth 3-4% annual growth (if business thrives) 1-2% (if consumer demand weakens)
Unemployment ~4% 3-4% (if private sector absorbs losses) 6-7% (due to public sector layoffs)
Wealth Inequality Rising, but still below peak levels Wider gap, but growth may offset impact Significant rise in poverty & homelessness
National Debt ~120% of GDP Under 100% (if deficit reduction works) Over 130% (if revenue loss outweighs cuts)
Stock Market Strong, S\&P 500 rising Boom in energy, defense, finance sectors Decline due to weak consumer demand
Healthcare Access Stable, but costly Slightly worse, more privatization Much worse, many uninsured
Life Expectancy ~77 years 76-78 years (if economy offsets social cuts) Below 75 (if healthcare cuts worsen outcomes)
Education System Underfunded, but functional Declining, higher tuition costs Significant decline, fewer opportunities
Global Influence U.S. dominates militarily, soft power declining Military dominance maintained, soft power reduced Both military and soft power weakened
Energy Position Fossil fuels growing, renewables expanding Energy independence, fossil fuels dominate Climate action setbacks, reliance on fossil fuels
Crime & Social Stability Moderate, rising in some areas Stable (if private sector absorbs losses) Higher crime, protests, strikes

Final Verdict: Is the U.S. Better or Worse Off in 2030?

🏆 BEST-CASE SCENARIO (20% probability):
The economy grows strongly, inflation stabilizes, and corporate investments compensate for lost public spending. The U.S. remains dominant in global security but loses soft power due to reduced diplomacy and aid.

❌ WORST-CASE SCENARIO (50% probability):
The U.S. experiences more inequality, lower life expectancy, a weaker workforce, and higher crime. The national debt problem worsens, and the U.S. loses economic ground to China and the EU.

🎭 MOST LIKELY SCENARIO (30% probability):
A mixed outcome, where big businesses thrive, but the middle and lower classes suffer. The U.S. remains a military power but falls behind in innovation, education, and social stability.

Conclusion:

  • If the private sector can generate enough jobs and investment to offset social cuts, the U.S. will be better off in terms of GDP growth, stock markets, and fiscal stability.
  • However, if corporations fail to fill the gaps left by government spending cuts, poverty, social unrest, and economic instability will push the U.S. further behind peer nations.
  • By 2030, the U.S. will either emerge as a more business-driven, low-tax economy or an increasingly divided nation struggling with social and economic instability.